The “Forbidden Fruit” Effect: What Happens When We Hold Back Technology From Kids
- The White Hatter
- 2 hours ago
- 4 min read
Sonia Livingstone, a professor of social psychology at the London School of Economics and Political Science, has spent decades studying how children interact with technology, the internet, and social media. Her work consistently emphasizes a critical point for parents and caregivers; simply holding back access to technology doesn’t always protect kids, it can make it even more tempting. As Dr Livingstone put it, “It becomes a forbidden fruit.”
Parents and caregivers often believe that delaying or banning technology shields children from risk. While this instinct comes from a place of love and protection, Livingstone’s research suggests the opposite effect can occur. When something is completely off limits, it builds curiosity and desire. (1) Youth and teens may start to seek it out in secret, without the discussions, guidance, or safeguards parents and caregivers could provide. The result, if something does happen because the child did covertly access technology, they will be less likely to go to parents and caregivers for help for fear of punishment.
Instead of prevention, over restrictions can drive risky behaviour underground and we here at the White Hatter have seen this first hand. (2) Teens, in particular, are known for pushing against boundaries. If technology is framed as “bad” or “dangerous,” it doesn’t remove the draw, it amplifies it!
What youth and teens need most is not avoidance or prohibitions, but support. Just as we teach young people to cross the road safely instead of never letting them near a street, they need scaffolding for digital life. (3)
Introducing technology gradually, in a way that matches a child’s age and developmental stage, combined with digital literacy education, helps avoid overwhelming them while giving them time to learn and adapt. Instead of handing over a fully loaded smartphone as a first step, parents can start with simpler devices or limited features. This allows youth and teens to build confidence, practice responsibility, and develop healthy habits incrementally. By scaffolding their experience, parents and caregivers give their kids the space to grow into technology, rather than being dropped into the deep end all at once.
Clear boundaries are another key piece of the puzzle. Youth and teens are more likely to respect rules when they understand why those rules exist. Instead of saying “no screens at night” without context, parents and caregivers can explain how late-night use disrupts sleep and makes the next day harder. Framing boundaries around health, safety, and balance helps youth and teens see them as supportive guardrails, not arbitrary restrictions. Over time, this not only fosters digital literacy but also encourages youth and teens to take ownership of making good choices themselves.
Open conversations about the risks and benefits of technology play an equally important role. Youth and teens are naturally curious, and if adults only emphasize the dangers, youth and teens may go looking for answers elsewhere, sometimes in unreliable or unsafe places. By discussing both the positives (connection, learning, creativity) and the negatives (privacy concerns, harmful content, peer pressure), parents and caregivers can guide their child toward critical thinking. When youth and teens understand the “why” behind healthy tech use, they are better equipped to make thoughtful decisions when parents and caregivers aren’t there to supervise.
Modelling balanced use as parents and caregivers sets the strongest example of all. Youth and teens notice how adults use their devices, whether a phone is constantly in hand or treated as a helpful tool. Demonstrating habits like putting the phone away during meals, using social media with intention rather than out of boredom, or prioritizing face to face interactions shows youth and teens what balance looks like in practice. More than rules or lectures, it’s this lived example that shapes how youth and teens will approach technology themselves.
The narrative that “the longer kids are offline, the better” has gained traction over the past year and a half. However, Livingstone’s insight, as well as many other academic researchers who study youth specific to this issue, challenge that idea. (4) Prolonged restriction without education risks sending youth and teens into digital spaces unprepared when they inevitably do get access, whether at home, at school, or through friends.
The real solution lies in helping youth and teens build digital literacy, resilience, and decision-making skills while they are still under parental guidance rather than bans and prohibitions in isolation.
We believe the solution isn’t to turn technology, the internet, and social media into a forbidden fruit by asking, “How long can I keep my child away from it?” Instead, we encourage parents and caregivers to ask, “How can I prepare my child for both the positives and the challenges of the technology rich world they are already growing up in? The solution isn’t to turn technology, the internet, and social media into a forbidden fruit, but to weave them into family conversations, guidance, and trust.
Digital Food For Thought
The White Hatter
Facts Not Fear, Facts Not Emotions, Enlighten Not Frighten, Know Tech Not No Tech
References
